Basketball Association of the Philippines (BAP) Inc.
Righteous, Truth & Justice
  • Home
  • History
  • BAP Officers
  • Accredited Members & Associations
    • Accredited Associations
    • Int'l Chapter Members
    • National Capital Region (NCR)
    • Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR)
    • Region 1
    • Region 2
    • Region 3
    • Region 4
    • Region 5
    • Region 6
    • Region 7
    • Region 8
    • Region 9
    • Region 10
    • Region 11
    • Region 12
    • Region 13 CARAGA
    • ARMM Region
  • Bangkok Agreement
  • Calendar of Events
  • Contact
  • News Blog
  • Vision, its Purpose & Mission
  • ISCA
  • Posthumous Recognition

Sen. Joey Lina's press statement

3/15/2006

0 Comments

 
PictureLina with Dato' Yeoh (r)
Press Statement of Former Senator Joey Lina
President, BAP
March 15, 2006
0918 903 7248
 
The surest and fastest way to lift the suspension on Philippine participation in FIBA and IOC-sanctioned international basketball tournaments is for the BAP to amend its Constitution and By-Laws, with the direct participation of PBA, UAAP, NCAA and PBL in the preparation of the necessary amendments that will follow the FIBA guidelines and statutes, and then for the POC to approve the BAP reapplication as member. This is known as the “return to the status quo” or “Bap return to POC” process.
 
FIBA Secretary-General Patrick Baumann unmistakably said so in his letter to the POC President Jose Cojuangco dated October 27, 2006, to quote:
 
“Should the POC wish to re-visit its position on BAP, the MOU process is unnecessary and our ban can be lifted immediately.  In such event, for the benefit of a long-term solution for basketball, we are at your disposal to continue to assist the POC and BAP in order to rapidly implement the necessary changes in the BAP constitution and organization, along the lines recommended in the MOU and the documents already provided by FIBA to Mr. Aventajado.”
 
The above approach or process was the consensus reached among the PBA, UAAP, PBL representatives, and myself during a meeting in January called by POC President. Peping Cojuangco in his residence presided by POC Chair Robert Aventajado with POC legal counsel Ding Tanjuatco in attendance.
 
We met four times using this process.  On the fifth meeting, which I was unable to attend as I was preparing for a foreign trip, another process was abruptly agreed upon by the other stakeholders. In said meeting, Mr. Eala, who was all the time our meeting facilitator as designated by the POC briefed the other stakeholders about his conversation with Mr. Cojuangco, which in gist meant that the process we had taken was unacceptable to the POC.  If media reports are correct, then, I would say, the other stakeholders drew a smaller circle that kept me out, using the MOU process, which we did not agree on in the first place.
 
PBA Commissioner Noli Eala himself was the main advocate of the “BAP return to POC” process and who articulated the need for a more expedient, practical and reasonable process to put an end to the current impasse in basketball which has already lost the Philippines two regional basketball titles, the SEA Games and SEABA, and forfeiture of Philippine participation in other international basketball tournaments.
 
In that said meeting at Mr. Cojuangco’s residence, I explained my position very clearly that I was attending the meeting not merely as an individual but as BAP President.  The BAP has authorized me to attend the meeting to explore and exhaust all means possible to lift the suspension on Philippine participation in international basketball tournaments and resolve once and for all the disunity problem plaguing Philippine basketball.
 
I also explained that the MOU process which the POC insisted should be followed had been clarified by FIBA Secretary-General Baumann in his October 27 letter to Mr. Cojuangco.  Baumann described the process as, quote:
 
“Obviously as we see the local situation in your country as of today, this process does not seem to be as peaceful as desired and will thus be long and tedious.” (underscoring supplied)
 
Baumann also clarified that “any other process than the return to status quo requires first the full suspension of the BAP from FIBA and then the provisional recognition of the new entity, by then already approved by the General Assembly of the POC.”
 
The MOU should be interpreted together with Baumann’s clarification of 27 October 2005, which the POC refused to do.
 
The MOU, together with the clarification, will therefore proceed in this manner:  First, the BAP should first be expelled by FIBA because the BAP is an active member in good standing. Only  when the BAP is expelled by FIBA that FIBA can recognize a new cage body in the Philippines. But the BAP can only be suspended or expelled by FIBA for cause.  There exists no ground for FIBA to expel or even suspend the BAP.  In fact, FIBA in deciding the application for membership of the POC-sponsored PBFI, declared that the BAP expulsion by the POC was “inappropriate and out of proportion…In fact, the sequence of events rather demonstrates that the suspension was a maneuver to reach the expulsion of the BAP and the integration of the opposing personalities under the PBFI.”
 
The MOU process is long and tedious.  There should be a complaint and observance of due process. Whatever decision is made the FIBA Central Board will take it up and then the FIBA Congress.
 
For the MOU process therefore to be successful, Baumann said “it will require all basketball stakeholders to rapidly buy into the concept and to ensure smooth transition and completion.”
 
Between the “return to status quo” or the “BAP return to the POC” process, and the MOU process, the stakeholders’ consensus was the earlier, i.e. BAP return to the POC.  Mr. Eala himself said that through this process, the Philippines can immediately participate in FIBA and IOC-sancitoned tournaments.
 
This was why I decided to meet with the PBA, UAAP, NCAA and PBL representatives.  After the meeting at Mr. Cojuangco’s residence, I actively participated together with the stakeholders in drafting the necessary amendments to the BAP Constitution and By-Laws.
 
As a matter of fact, the stakeholders always referred to the BAP Constitution and By-Laws for the amendments and borrowed from the US Basketball Association some ideas that are applicable to the Philippine situation.
 
It would have been unthinkable for me to attend meetings aimed at the destruction of the very organization I am President of.
 
In conclusion, the BAP, PBA, UAAP, NCAA and PBL were inside one circle when we met four times, discussing the vision, mission, objectives and programs of Philippine basketball using the BAP return to the POC as our framework.  Without even conferring with me, they literally abandoned our earlier agreement.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    17th FIBA World Congress, Indianapolis, USA in 2002
    Picture
    The Legends

    Author

    BAP writes  something about the Past, Present, 
    & Future News & Events

    Archives

    December 2021
    June 2021
    December 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    March 2019
    June 2017
    October 2016
    May 2016
    September 2015
    February 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    December 2011
    September 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    April 2010
    January 2010
    October 2009
    September 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    February 2008
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    January 2007
    October 2006
    May 2006
    March 2006
    December 2005
    November 2004
    June 2003

    Categories

    All

    Picture
    Picture
    Head of Delegation Meeting in the 20th ASEAN University Games 2022
    Picture

    Submit
    Picture
    AUSC General Assembly 2019
    Picture
    Picture
    1st BAP President, Senator Ambrosio Padilla
    Picture
    Philippine national team in Berlin Olympics
    Picture
    Two-time FIBA President, Hon. Gonzalo "Lito" G. Puyat II, and 2nd BAP President started in 1968 and BAP Chairman Emeritus.
    Picture
    FIBA President, Dr. Carl Men Ky Ching, 2002-2006
    Picture
    FIBA Asia Secretary-General Dato' Yeoh Choo Hock (seated 2nd at left) and BAP President Quintellano "Tiny" Literal (seated at right) in 1998
    Picture
    FIBA President Carl Men Ky Ching with BAP Officials in San Pablo, Laguna
    Picture
    BAP President, Senator Joey Lina with China national player, Wang Zhi Zhi who played in the NBA LA Clippers.
    Picture
    Picture
    Philippine President, Hon. Rodrigo Roa Duterte, with BAP officials led by Graham C. Lim
    Picture
    BAP President, Prof. Robert Milton Calo (right) with FESSAP Executives
    Picture
    In 2002 at FIBA World Congress in Indianapolis-USA, BAP President Tiny Literal and Secretary-General Graham C. Lim met FIBA President, Dr, Carl Men Ky Ching and FIBA Asia Secretary General Dato' Yeoh Choo Hock.
    Picture
    BAP Masbate Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Rizal Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Aklan Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Capiz Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Cebu Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Bohol Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Laguna Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Bicol Chapter
    Picture
    BAP Cordillera Chapter
    Picture
    BAP National Capital Region (NCR) Chapter 2019
    Picture
    BAP Tagum Chapter
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    BAP Incorporated
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    NCRAA 2021
    Picture
    Picture
    FESSAP Coaches Club
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    GCL
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.